Public journey inventory
Canonical routes, entry states, informational versus interactive boundaries, crawl directives, and mobile and desktop behavior.
For digital-health and behavioral-health software teams
Privacy and Screening Readiness Review
A fixed-scope technical and content review for public-facing mental-health or substance-use screening journeys. The review uses public pages or fictional staging evidence and returns a practical readiness report without accepting health data.
No patient data accepted
No answers or scores collected
Verified evidence separated from unknowns
Do not email patient records, assessment answers, scores, diagnoses, or other health information.
Founding-client offer
$495 fixed scope
Written scope confirmation comes first. The review is normally delivered within five business days after the agreed public or fictional staging access is available.
Included
- Up to five public or fictional staging routes
- One named screening journey or instrument family
- Desktop and mobile entry-state review without real answers or scores
- Evidence, rights, privacy, crisis, accessibility, crawl, and release-gate findings
- Prioritized written report and one follow-up email
Not included
- Legal advice, regulatory certification, or an instrument licence
- Clinical validation, diagnosis, treatment guidance, or topic-specialist sign-off
- Penetration testing, formal WCAG conformance, code remediation, or deployment
- Review of patient records, production health data, answers, scores, or diagnoses
- Guarantees of safety, compliance, approval, traffic, or business results
What the review covers
Instrument rights evidence
Authoritative owner or publisher terms, exact-version records, missing approvals, and commercial-use gates without reproducing restricted items.
Privacy and network boundary
Data-flow claims, browser storage, request metadata, analytics and advertising isolation, sharing behavior, and third-party requests.
Safety and clinical limits
Crisis actions, non-diagnostic language, result-copy boundaries, reviewer scope, and findings that require topic-qualified review.
Accessibility and usability
Keyboard entry, labels, focus behavior, result announcements, touch targets, narrow-screen layout, and printable-state risks.
Discovery and release controls
Titles, canonicals, sitemap and indexing state, internal discovery, structured data, release checks, and prioritized remediation.
A bounded three-step process
- 1
Confirm scope
Name the public routes, instrument list, staging boundary, and questions the review should answer.
- 2
Review fictional evidence
Inspect public or non-sensitive staging states without entering real answers or generating real assessment results.
- 3
Deliver the register
Separate verified evidence, inference, unknowns, release blockers, and the highest-value remediation steps.
Best fit—and when to choose someone else
Best fit
- A digital-health or behavioral-health software team has a small public screening journey to review.
- The team needs evidence gaps and release blockers organized before specialist sign-off or release.
- The work can be completed from public pages or fictional, non-sensitive staging states.
Choose a qualified specialist instead
- You need legal advice, regulatory certification, a penetration test, or formal WCAG conformance.
- You need clinical validation, crisis-program design, or permission to use a published instrument.
- The work requires access to patient records, real answers, scores, diagnoses, or production health data.
Before work begins
- The public or fictional staging routes and exact review boundary are confirmed in writing.
- The fixed price, timing, deliverables, payment terms, and cancellation terms are confirmed in writing.
- No work begins until both sides accept that written scope and the agreed payment terms.
This site does not collect payment. Never email card or bank details, patient records, assessment answers, scores, diagnoses, or other health information.
Exact limits
This is a technical and content-readiness review, not a legal opinion, clinical validation, instrument licence, penetration test, accessibility certification, diagnosis, or assurance of regulatory compliance.
- Only an instrument owner or authorized publisher can grant reuse permission.
- Clinical items, scoring, thresholds, crisis branches, and care guidance may require topic-qualified clinical review.
- Legal, privacy, security, and accessibility conclusions must be made by professionals qualified for the exact jurisdiction and scope.
- No review changes production or represents that a product is safe for diagnosis or treatment.
Frequently asked questions
Does the review require patient records or assessment results?
No. The review uses public pages or a fictional, non-sensitive staging environment. Do not send patient records, assessment answers, scores, diagnoses, or other health information.
Is this a legal, clinical, security, or accessibility certification?
No. It is a bounded technical and content-readiness review. Findings that require legal advice, clinical validation, a penetration test, or formal accessibility conformance must be handled by appropriately qualified professionals.
Can the review grant permission to use a screening instrument?
No. The review can organize current authoritative evidence and identify missing permission records, but only the instrument owner or authorized publisher can grant rights.
What does the deliverable include?
A concise readiness report with a route inventory, evidence and rights register, prioritized findings, and a release-gate checklist. The founding scope covers up to five public routes and one follow-up email.
How is payment handled?
MindCheck Tools does not collect payment on this website. If the review is a fit, the written scope, price, timing, deliverables, payment terms, and cancellation terms are confirmed before work begins. Do not email card or bank details, patient records, or other sensitive health information.
Start with the scope, not sensitive data
Describe the product, public routes, and business question. Do not include patient records, assessment answers, scores, diagnoses, or other health information.
Email MindCheck ToolsInclude only these non-health details:
Organization and website URL, your name and role, public or fictional staging URL, approximate route count, instrument names if known, primary goal, and desired timeline. Confirm that no patient or health information is included.